Article: DRMJ vol14 no01 2025 (Clanek 3)
Publication:
DOI:
doi:10.17708/DRMJ.2025.v14n01a03
Author(s):
Excerpt:
Multilevel ambidexterity is an emerging but not yet fully explored theme in paradox research. Although organizational ambidexterity represents a well‐established and mature level of analysis, research on unit/team and job/individual ambidexterity remains in its early stages of development. A bibliometric analysis has been conducted to provide an updated and integrative literature review of the current structure, trends, and research gaps in the ambidexterity literature. The goal was to assess the past (performance analysis), examine the present (co‐authorship, co‐[key]words or co‐occurrence, and co‐citation analyses), and anticipate future directions (bibliographic coupling) of interorganizational, organizational, unit (team), and individual (employee/job) ambidexterity. The search utilized the Web of Science Core Collection database, yielding 900 primary and 24,742 secondary prefiltered publications covering the period up to September 2024. The findings from science mapping guide scholars toward future theoretical and strategic frameworks that help organizational practitioners address the balancing challenges encountered at multiple levels of analysis.
Pages:
39-58
Keywords: